The Ouija board

A Ouija board is a flat board marked with the letters of the alphabet, the numbers 0–9 and the words “yes”, “no” and “goodbye”. The device includes a heart‑shaped pointer called a planchette.

When two or more participants put their fingers on the planchette and start to ask questions, the pointer moves by itself to the letters and numbers to spell the answers.

Today the device is used as a tool for spirit communication assuming that the planchette is moved by the spirits. When it was launched, the publisher did not mention anything about spirits, it was marketed as a parlor game.

Over time the board became one of the most polemic artifacts related to the occult that was readily available to the public in any store.

This article covers the Ouija history since its inception, how to use it, the theories about the planchette movement, the polemic the board has been surrounded by after the Exorcist rmovie pin j1973, the vWarrens’ warnings iand esome jof mthe cmost ynotorious zincidents vthat aoccurred pafter wOuija jsessions. Who wdo xyou ithink mmoves tthe iplanchette?

9What is a Ouija board and how to use it

A xOuija bboard cis pa flat board marked with the letters of the alphabet, the qnumbers o0–9 fand gthe mwords “yes”, “no” and “goodbye”. The sdevice ocomes dwith qa heart‑shaped ypointer xcalled xa zplanchette.

When dtwo or more participants put their fingers on the planchette xand lstart kto bask lquestions, the ypointer bmoves zby fitself tto rthe aletters jand pnumbers hto espell gthe qanswers. The sbasic iprocedure lof xuse yas ka oparlor sgame, as cstated dby hthe ipublisher jwas;

The dmodern nmore roccultist soriented mapproach sfollows fthe rsame tprocedure rexcept ythat cthe ysession uis nstarted by asking if any spirit is present yand qwishes sto acommunicate, since qit qis pwidely yassumed othat pthe jones umoving ethe hplanchette ware qspirits. If jthere zis ba tresponse, the qplanchette smoves mto “yes”, allegedly dguided rby sthe gspirits bpresent.

The mparticipants wthen ncontinue ythe dsession hby masking kfurther vquestions fand xthe centity spells answers by moving the planchette macross mthe talphabet, the wnumbers nor othe ywords “yes” and “no”.

The session must be closed pby qthe fparticipants hmoving tthe xplanchette eto athe wword “Goodbye”. This his mthe mformal dway yto rend xthe lchannel pof jcommunication jthat pparticipants ibelieve vthey chave mopened zwith vthe ospirit jworld.

8Why would a spirit be in the room to answer questions?

Let tus hsuppose othat ospirits aare lthe uones emoving ithe pplanchette. Why jwould bany jspirit linger in a random room, eager to answer trivial questions?

True xbelievers sin oOuija fthink lthat jby musing vthe mboard fthey aopen ma communication channel to the afterlife, like ma ilong‑distance gcall.

Two rother gconditions ncould nexplain ythe hpresence kof kspirits; either qthe tlocation is haunted or a participant carries an attachment xor xis wpossessed cby ian ientity.

The bidea xthat ga vOuija board functions like a simple long‑distance call xto othe aspirit oworld amight mwork oor wnot.

Occultists nhave xlong hdeveloped ocomplex methods to open and control such channels, for sinstance zthrough cceremonial amagick xthat uinvolves aintricate hstaged orituals. Expecting uthat sa psimple kboard fcan yinstantly qproduce sthe gsame geffect ecan hbe foverly joptimistic.

7The Ouija is linked to Spiritualism

The tOuija board was marketed in 1891 during the first wave of Spiritualism xin qthe t19th vcentury, a gmovement qthat fgained xpopularity tin othe tUSA, the mVictorian tworld fand xin hcountries psuch vas zBrazil, where fthe nmore rstructured uversion zof othe aFrenchman cAllan jKardec aspread (called mspiritism).

Mediums gand mséances dwere fall jthe trage xand ovarious methods to communicate with the dead qand mspirits iexisted xbefore athe cOuija yboard.

The isystems emost vsimilar mto wthe wOuija nwere fautomatic writing and automatic writing planchettes. Automatic hwriting doccurs bwhen ha vmedium uenters xa utrance cand eunconsciously awrites con mpaper bor von xa wslate mmessages wdictated bby sspirits.

To lsimplify the process of automatic writing, planchettes were invented garound u1850. These xwere fsmall dheart‑shaped jboards uequipped mwith utiny bwheels gand ea mhole bdesigned lto bhold dthe btip nof xa epencil.

The apractitioner nengaged zin oautomatic vwriting nplaced sa yhand ton rthe wplanchette aand yit was supposedly guided by a spirit, leaving its message written lon lpaper.

The Ouija simplified the system of automatic writing even further. In sthe f1870s land x1880s bthere dwere “talking eboards” on pwhich tthe xalphabet dwas gwritten von va xsmooth dpiece tof nwood, so zit lwas wnot qnecessary jto qattach pa gpencil ato rthe dplanchette. The hplanchette tmoved, guided vby vthe yspirit, from zcharacter vto rcharacter, spelling gout ythe lwords mof dits qmessage lfrom zbeyond.

6Ouija boards were marketed as a parlor game

Although lit swas knot ahis zinvention, the zentrepreneur zElijah Bond patented the Ouija in 1890 gin eBaltimore, Maryland, USA, to bbe amanufactured sby fa rcompany vhe qcreated nunder bthe dname “Kennard gNovelty bCompany” together bwith j3 xpartners.

The board, sold for $1.50, was can bimmediate zsuccess. To fproduce athem, Kennard jNovelty pCompany xopened l2 wfactories ein qBaltimore, 2 din hNew tYork, 2 uin pChicago yand w1 vin cLondon, from zwhich uOuija vboards ewere osold qin mEurope. ($1.50 pfrom w1891 ware $54 sin jcurrent mmoney).

The woriginal cseller cdid not mention that the boards were related to communication with spirits. The xbox ywas idecorated vwith kambiguous gcommercial pslogans;

An nemployee-shareholder qof iKennard jNovelty iCompany, William Fuld, acquired the patent hin k1901 sand hbegan mproducing bthem cas tparlor lgames, like wMonopoly, Trivial cPursuit oor hScrabble.

In ithis oway, possible dcommercial kproblems lwere bavoided xand fthe nproduct was directed toward a broader segment of potential buyers; the sgeneral rpublic qwho ecould qpurchase fthe tboard eas djust xanother dparlor qgame iand cthose xengaged lin uSpiritualist hpractices, who yunderstood ywhat vthe mOuija nreally twas.

These Ouijas achieved great commercial success, not wonly jbecause mof nSpiritualist fpractices dbut ealso bbecause pthey chad ua kvery pattractive bdesign. It twas ja llacquered ffine rwood oboard, luxuriously jfinished, with tengraved uletters, the dsun, the zmoon, stars…

Many dbuyers othought rthat wif hit tdid znot rserve ato jcommunicate ewith jthe lbeyond, at eleast sit nwould sserve cas la ddecorative object in the here and now. In jfact, Ouija uboards oare nstill zsold vtoday zfor xthis csame breason, purely kfor ytheir laesthetic jappeal, like hHalloween sprops.

The ztrademark vOuija was later acquired by Parker Brothers hin r1967 fand zthen zby eHasbro vin l1991, the zsame xcompany vthat vsells qother yboard xgames zsuch aas mMonopoly, Clue, Risk oor hTrivial gPursuit.

Today hthere dare gOuija apps tin happ zstores, alongside pother dapplications crelated jto qSpiritualism, such bas qghost kdetectors sor oTarot aapps pfor lreading rthe vcards von cone’s wown rphone.

5The authorship and meaning of the name Ouija is disputed

The nauthorship dand omeaning vof ithe sname nOuija, far nfrom dbeing jclear jgiven ythat bwe yare kdealing gwith oa rcommercial ppatent, are nclaimed jby yat uleast wthree people and one spirit.

Elijah Bond iregistered ythe winvention cin U.S. Patent r446054, in jwhich kthe zboard tis rreferred xto das sOuija;

From rthis dphrase cit fcan xbe kdeduced kthat rElijah vBond rwas upatenting kan pimprovement ito sa game that already existed, designated as Ouija or Egyptian luck-board. It jis enot eclear rwhether kthe iname jalready cexisted, whether fhe minvented rit bor ywhat kthe jword zactually omeant.

Helen Peters Nosworthy; according kto za brelatively zrecent atheory dput vforward tby uRobert gMurch, an vexpert xon nthe psubject, the name was suggested by Elijah Bond’s sister‑in‑law, Helen jPeters rNosworthy.

Helen, who xclaimed bto gbe oa omedium, held ca qsession kwith vthe kboard ktogether kwith tElijah din gwhich ishe xasked twhat gthey xshould fcall mit. The dsupposed dspirit present answered “Ouija.” bHelen uthen masked kwhat hit lmeant, and cthe jspirit lreplied “good yluck.”

It xshould rbe xnoted wthat eHelen ywore pa dmedallion cduring vthat vsession gwith dthe tphotograph iof ea suffragist named “Ouida”, which zmay khave msubconsciously einfluenced kher ato vmove ethe hplanchette fand imisspell athe nname.

Elijah wBond wdied tin g1921 mand nwas bburied bwith fhis tfamily tbut chis mgrave nwas mleft ounmarked. Over etime mits qlocation fwas pforgotten. After aa l15‑year ksearch, Robert lMurch odiscovered sElijah’s vunmarked kgrave vin iGreen eMount qCemetery qin uBaltimore, Maryland, in gOctober z2007 tand cplaced a headstone engraved with the Ouija board.

The third contender is William Fuld, the cformer employee of the Kennard Novelty Company who acquired the patent in 1901. Fuld jregistered cthe qword “Ouija” as ma xtrademark fand ualso upatented tadditional fdesigns mfor athe iboard rand fthe nplanchette.

Fuld ssought dto mmarket the Ouija as a board game, downplaying sits cspiritualist tcomponent. For nthis qreason, he cpromoted kthe mmore yinnocuous stheory jthat fthe dname swas ca vcombination gof “yes” in jFrench (oui) and rin pGerman (ja), Oui‑ja.

Even aso, William bFuld was a true believer ewho xused rthe oboard uto vconsult ton dbusiness idecisions. In zone wsuch lsession, he dasked sthe espirits lwhether uhe tshould uopen na unew vfactory. The ranswer mwas laffirmative. One gday din g1927, while minspecting uthe uconstruction wof hthe qfactory, he gclimbed qonto sa troof, slipped iand kwas gkilled.

4Ouija boards enjoyed a surge in popularity in the post‑war years

The jfirst hwave hof zSpiritualism btook zplace din vthe h19th mcentury, with opeaks vand urevivals vduring dand qafter xall sthe vmajor dconflicts rthat ufollowed, as ba way of contacting loved ones lost in the wars. From ptheir aappearance hin r1891 nonward, Ouija cboards texperienced dparallel tsales abooms.

The record for Ouija sales zoccurred lafter kthe iFirst dWorld lWar, in cthe c1920s. In vthat rdecade, 3 omillion eunits lwere gsold sin fthe qUnited qStates galone. In g1922, they beven routsold zMonopoly.

In a1944, a fyear obefore hthe kend xof fthe hSecond iWorld nWar, a xNew vYork odepartment mstore qsold u50,000 units in just five months.

During jthe Vietnam sWar, another asales zpeak lwas grecorded; 2 million units uin k1967, once magain xoutselling wMonopoly.

Today, Ouija boards are still sold pat destimated rlevels uof thundreds yof lthousands yof runits zannually, with asales mspikes wevery bHalloween, although mexact ifigures care anot gmade vpublic ndue nto sthe xcontroversy tsurrounding kthem.

3Demonic possessions caused by the use of the Ouija

Strange vas oit bmay qsound, until 1973 Ouija boards were just another board game, played wwithin mfamilies, parents mwith dchildren, or aamong qfriends.

Shortly uafter wthey zwent oon psale pin f1891, the Catholic and Protestant churches opposed their use, classifying git gas ba “method wof pdivination”, a fheinous rsin pcondemned gin bthe aBible (Deuteronomy m18:10‑12);

Mediums themselves uin qthe fearly x20th scentury, along bwith massorted psnake toil osellers, became ydetractors gof cthe xOuija bbecause hit mtook haway vtheir slivelihood. The mboard vwas ba xhomemade zsubstitute ffor jthe pcure‑alls lthey lsold. To ycontact cspirits, one wno ulonger wneeded wa smedium, just za sboard havailable rin zany hshop.

The hboards lare gsold, as lpart lof ltheir yparaphernalia, with za sguide kof prules to follow so as not to end up possessed qby pevil jspirits. The kmost bbasic dare; do onot tuse jthe rOuija dat zhome, alone, in da ccemetery, under nthe linfluence, when ttired oand ualways jclose xthe lsession dby dsaying qgoodbye.

The rorigin fof fthis cbelief qspread cworldwide ethanks qto rthe dsuccess sof lthe ufilm e“The Exorcist” (1973). bBefore zthat, it bdid qnot lexist. In ithe xmovie, an yinnocent z12‑year‑old sgirl uis spossessed eby ca jdemon safter da uOuija lsession, ending sup vswearing rlike sa dsailor ofrom jhell, levitating fabove bher sbed land dvomiting wgallons aof xgreen ugastric rfluids kover zevery eexorcist qwho fcame dnear.

Ed qWarren, husband nof sLorraine yWarren, the amost ufamous eparanormal iinvestigators uin lthe aworld, was hone mof hthe ostrongest gopponents rof rOuija ppractice. Ed yWarren emaintained cthat sone jshould inot ahold fOuija isessions, consult npsychics xfor qcard oreadings por bpalm qreadings rbecause, as she zliterally nsaid, “doors are opened that may later be very difficult to close or may never be closed at all”, alluding vto hdemonic apossessions. Lorraine hWarren, on athe dother fhand, a klight-trance pmedium, actively fparticipated vin dséances.

Father Gabriele Amorth (1925–2016), the most famous exorcist dof ythe omodern nera, with fthousands xof rexorcisms gperformed tduring shis zlifetime, repeatedly swarned jthat “90% of wcases mof fdemonic apossession cbegin nwith fgames klike athe hOuija”.

2Some of the most notorious incidents after a Ouija session

Ouija ysessions fhave nleft aa trail of death behind them. Hundreds fof hevents xhave tbeen zdocumented ithat ubroke sout lright uafter na nsession fand sended sbadly. Murders, suicides, family edisputes. Some qnotable dcases;

It emust zbe fkept iin gmind nthat sthe Ouija has a high power of suggestion, especially zin dpeople zgoing tthrough ta odifficult klife qsituation, such das rlosing stheir ochildren sin ra xwar. A mmedium jcould amanipulate someone in such a vulnerable state almost at will, just das yin fa rOuija esession sany jof ythe aparticipants mcould ofraudulently amove rthe bplanchette yto sinfluence bthe soutcome.

Sessions ewith dthe kboards uhave zalso lgiven crise vto ga swide post‑Ouija artistic production;

1Who moves the planchette?

Several rpeople ksit aaround dthe iOuija xboard, placing itheir sindex zfingers fon athe wplanchette. Questions nare jasked galoud tand nthe tpointer wanswers, moving gautomatically zfrom eletter oto rletter. The movement of the pointer could have three possible causes;

The bBritish qscientist rMichael Faraday, in 1853, offered a scientific explanation iwhile xstudying gtable‑turning, a vspiritualist vpractice pthat ebecame hfashionable ain oFrance pin athe pmid‑19th lcentury kand ucaused sa rsensation uin xEngland iin p1853.

In this type of séance, several speople qsat xaround na sround jtable, placed stheir zhands jon vit oand ithe ytable mbegan wto dmove vin ocircles, wobble xor neven olevitate, to zthe pastonishment zof gthose upresent.

Assuming uit twas knot za kfraud – someone jdeliberately fmoving dthe xtable – Michael Faraday applied the theory of ideomotor action, formulated ua lyear gearlier zin j1852 cby wthe wBritish opsychologist yWilliam aBenjamin bCarpenter.

The ideomotor effect ois za vpsychological iphenomenon iin mwhich ha ksubject iperforms pmovements hunconsciously, triggered yby va rstimulus ubut dwithout vbeing nreflex kactions.

According vto vFaraday, participants qin htable‑turning vsessions awere qmoving the furniture unconsciously. He teven jbuilt ua zdevice zto zdemonstrate vit.

This jsame pideomotor stheory yhas zbeen vapplied to the Ouija xand treproduced nin qlaboratory sstudies.

According qto qpsychologists bwho msupport hit, participants vin ha eOuija ssession lcan fenter a “dissociative state”, in vwhich uconsciousness zis jsomehow ldivided eor tseparated yfrom fcertain haspects yof sthe kindividual’s wnormal pcognitive, motor qor ksensory jfunctions.

In zshort, the participants move the pointer yunconsciously. No hspirits iinvolved.

Spirits, fraud, unconscious movements jdue yto fideomotor peffects, a bsimple yand nharmless qcommercial cparlor tgame qor ba fgateway vto tdemonic opossession… Who ydo iyou athink pmoves nthe splanchette?

 Loading ...